Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Ragged-to-Riches: Ragged Dick

The story of Ragged Dick was written by Horatio Alger, using Alger’s common plot line of rags-to-riches.  Dick Hunter, a boy living on the streets since the age of seven, is now fourteen and working as a boot-black.  He has gotten by with many jobs, adapting to the situation.  He was the paperboy for a while, and also sold matches.  He made enough money to get by, and would spend the extra to gamble and buy cigars.  On the streets of New York in the 1800s, this was a fairly common sight, as evidenced by Dick’s friends.

Dick’s life changes when he meets Frank Whitney.  Frank is an honest boy brought in from the country by his uncle, and Dick offers to be his guide.  Along the way, Dick and Frank get to know each other and become friends.  Dick also gets a suit from Mr. Whitney, which becomes a prized possession for someone who only had a “Washington Coat” and “Napoleon Pants”.

Dick, after the encounter, tries his hardest to become “’spectable” so that he can get rich and live in luxury.  He starts saving his money, rents a room, and eventually lets Henry Fosdick stay in his room too.  Fosdick and Dick exchange lessons (for reading and writing, as Dick couldn’t read or write well) for the room rate (since Fosdick only had a little money).  At the end, Dick is able to read and write and both Fosdick and Dick get jobs that are better than shining boots.

Many themes surface in the story of Ragged Dick.  The main one that Alger presses is the importance of integrity and hard work.  Early on in the story, Dick shines the shoes of Mr. Greyson, who has no change with him.  Dick promises to pay the fifteen cents back to him, but Greyson isn’t sure if he will or not.  He thinks, “If he does, I will give him my custom regularly.  If he don’t, as is most likely, I shan’t mind the loss of fifteen cents.”  When he does give back the money, Greyson is very impressed and took him to church with his family and also fed them and welcomed him and Fosdick back whenever they wanted.

Another example of Dick’s integrity that stood out throughout the whole book was the fact that he never stole anything.  He had every excuse to steal, considering he lived on the street in a box with very little money gained from his profession.  He refused to, though.  When the “country chap” had his fifty dollars swindled from him, Dick got the money back and gave it right back to the man.
Dick’s courage is something that is noticed in the novel.  He was not afraid to do what he thought was right.  He would not worry about Micky Maguire or be provoked into something that would be wrong, like hit him first.  He gave money to Fosdick for a new suit; he spent his money on meals for others on occasion.  His greatest act of courage came as the child was drowning, where he acted almost instantly and saved him.  He was rewarded with a well-paying job and a new suit for his bravery, something that characterized him.

One of the things that we questioned was the reasonability of the time frame posed in Ragged Dick.  Dick breaks habits in one day that take some people years to break.  It never mentions him thinking about relapsing and going back to gambling and cigars.  I know he has a strong will and really wanted to be rich and respectable, but I think that Alger pushed the timeline a little fast for Dick.  Also, throughout the story, there are many flaws with his language.  Sometimes the word choice is poor, other times a stray word slips into the sentence that is not needed.  Surprisingly, this did not really detract from the story as much as I thought it would.
 

Discussion Questions

  1. Would you be as bold as Dick was when he confronted the swindler Ephraim Smith? Were you surprised that he gave back the money to the man it was stolen from?
  2. Dick is very witty and humorous, which I enjoyed very much. What did everyone else think of his humor? Do you have any specific examples?
  3. I was elated when Dick told Frank that he would no longer gamble, and when he started a savings account. What did you think of Dick's character development? Did it seem reasonable?
  4. Even with a dislike of violence, Dick handles himself well against his enemy Micky Maguire. I enjoyed how he didn't take advantage of the situation and only acted defensively. I think that this spoke to Dicks' true nature. Did anyone feel differently?
  5. When Dick took care of his friend Fosdick and gave him a place to stay, while helping other boot-blacks that he considered friends, there was a marked change in his life. Fosdick's private tutoring was a major turning point for Dick, and I believed that it was an important step that contributed to his success. Were there other situations that people think might have been more important to Dick's development?
  6. In a year, Dick transitions from spending his earnings on movies, cigars, oyster stews, and other pleasures, to finally saving up his money and contributing to the welfare of his friends. Do you think that this was a reasonable improvement for such a small time? What does this suggest about the believability of the author?  
  7. The rescue of the boy by Dick, an immediate response that wasn't spurred by greed or rewards, was also a pivotal moment. I think it shows that the smallest actions can have life-changing consequences, and that it also attributes a "lucky" theme into the novel. Were there any other "lucky" moments that were striking to you?
  8. In addition to luck, there were several branching and overlapping themes throughout the novel. These include the importance of hard work, what it means to grow up, that virtuous attributes are important to success, and it encompasses a “rags-to-respectability” element. Dick does not become wealthy and privileged, but his situation does improve drastically. Most of Horatio Alger Jr’s books were of the same caliber, even though he did not experience those same situations while growing up. He was not subject to the same hardships as the majority of his characters, so where do you think he gained the inspiration to depict his characters with relative accuracy?

5 comments:

  1. I wonder too about the "believability" of Dick's character in places. Aristotle wrote that to be believable, the character's motivation has to be consistent and true to life (he was talking about tragedy but we'll transplant those traits here to "Ragged Dick" anyway). So I suppose overall Dick acts in a consistent way, but I just find it so hard to believe that he could so easily abandon his other life. Am I too cynical?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would like to address questions 3, 5, and 6, all pertaining to the development of Dick.

    At the beginning of Ragged Dick, Dick made enough money from boot-blacking for the necessities but then wasted the rest of his daily earnings on things like gambling and smoking; essentially, he had bad habits. I believe these bad habits arose from living on the streets by himself for half of his life and never having a good role model, he only saw what other boot-blackers and street boys were doing around him. It was always in his character to become something more but he did not until he received that extra push from Frank and Mr. Whitney. They were the first people to really believe in him and give him some inspirational advice that with hard-work, an education, and saving his money, he could really become someone. Therefore, I think his complete change in lifestyle was reasonable because it was in his character all along, he just needed that extra guidance to begin a better life for himself.

    Besides Frank and Mr. Whitney, Henry Fosdick also helped in Dick's development by teaching him how to read and write and even how to pray. As I said before, he never knew how ignorant he was because the people around him were all at his same education level or maybe even less. Henry had to teach him how to pray because he was never familiarized with any sort of religion. In a way, Micky Maguire also shaped Dick's development. Even when Micky attacked and bullied Dick, Dick defended himself but never got caught up in the fighting; he always kept his character, as to not stoop down to Micky's level.

    As Ragged Dick transformed into Richard Hunter, he started spending his money on friends instead of his own pleasures. These actions were always a part of Dick's character, therefore I think his actions are believable. He bought other boot-blacks breakfast or a new suit even when he had little or no money, so it was no surprise that when he became wealthier, he would continue to help his friends. This included giving money to Tom Wilkins and his ill mother. Even when money was not involved, it was still in his character to help people whether there was a reward or not. He did not even think twice about saving the drowning boy. Overall, it can be seen from beginning to end that even though Dick becomes more educated, frugal, and a better version of himself, his honest and caring character was with him all along.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My post is geared towards the questions that talk about realism of all the events that happen to Dick. Question 3 touches on this concept along with Dr. Kungl's post as well.

    Both posts talk about the instantaneous shift in Dick's lifestyle. After talking to Frank, Dick stops all of his bad habits with money and starts to save his money. Giving away all of this frivolous spending does not seem as easy as the book makes it out to be. We all know that gambling can become addictive for some people. Psychologically the thrill of gambling makes it impossible for people to give it up. Dick had literally gambled all of his money to the point where he would have to sleep in a box. If he had this lack of control when it came to gambling before I just find it very hard to believe that he would have been able to quit cold turkey the way he did.

    The other thing that I wanted to address as far as realism comes from both the side of this story being realistic and not being realistic. Dick works hard throughout the novel. I believe that hard work is important in American society. Especially for someone who is coming from the lower class of society trying to work their way up in society. However, I do not think that this large jump in social class happens without catching a break and or having connections. Ragged Dick displayed both of these situations happening to him. I think that this shows a realistic factor to society, it took a combination of hard work and breaks to have Ragged Dick move up. However, I think it is unrealistic how many breaks that Dick got throughout the novel. Dick always was moving up and never saw a real setback throughout the novel. Everyone experiences setbacks in life and the fact Dick never experienced this I find very hard to believe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good points in both of these paragraphs; insightful comments about characters and their believability. One could argue that Dick's bankbook being stolen was kind of a setback, but even then, the banker was so nice and knew Dick so well that it is obvious that Jim wouldn't have gotten away with trying to take Dick's money.

      Delete
  4. In regards to Question 2, I did enjoy Dick’s humor, even though at certain points I was sure that it was going to get him into trouble. A particular example of this occurs when Dick is waiting with Fosdick outside the store where Fosdick eventually gets employed. While waiting, we first meet Roswell Crawford. He addresses Dick who in turn cracks a joke at Roswell’s expense. Roswell classifies himself as a young gentleman, and knowing that Dick is a boot-black, thinks less of him, and tries to degrade him in front of the other boys waiting for the position: “Do you expect to get this place when there’s gentlemen’s sons applying for it? A boot-black in a store! That would be a good joke.” From the beginning of this scene Dick refuses to be put down and his quick replies continue to instigate the situation. But, before things can go too far, the shopkeeper appears and the growing conflict quickly subsides.
    His wit attests to his confident personality, as seen in his encounter with the swindler, but I was afraid his somewhat outrageous statements would turn and bite him. However, this never seems to be the case. His personality is also positive, so there are humorous situations where Dick is just speculating to himself. An example of this that I liked was near the end of the book after Dick had jumped off the boat to save the little boy. Dick receives a new suit since his other clothes were wet.
    “He’s done a handsome thing,” said Dick to himself; “but there wasn’t no ‘casion for his givin’ me these clothes. My lucky stars are shinin’ pretty bright now. Jumpin’ into the water pays better that shinin’ boots; but I don’t think I’d like to try it more’n once a week.”
    He is obviously grateful for the clothes and reviews his daring dive into the water with much less gravity than what the situation called for.
    Dick’s good humor also allows him to take everything in stride. Nothing seems to keep him down. An example of this that I find funny is Dick’s response to the loss of his Washington coat and Napoleon pants. “By gracious!” he exclaimed; “somebody’s stole my Washington coat and Napoleon pants. Maybe it’s an agent of Barnum’s, who expects to make a fortun’ by exhibitin’ the valooable wardrobe of a gentleman of fashion.” Now at this point in the story Dick has got his life well turned around, so the loss of the clothing wasn’t really that much of a loss. I just thought it funny that his mind went instantly to some extravagant explanation as to how his old attire vanished. It seems that Dick is just a naturally pleasant fellow, whose good humor leaks into many of his interactions, keeping the mood light.

    ReplyDelete