Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Tenement Life


Background: Tenement buildings were four or five stories high and there were 4 tenement buildings to a block, which was 700 ft x 200 ft.  There were typically 1, 736 rooms to a tenement.  At the time, there were 33,000 tenements in New York City with 2,076 people in 1,736 rooms which contained 460 families.  These rooms were about the size of a small closet and were overly crowded.  Due to this overcrowding, New York had a population density of 290,000 people per square mile compared to London’s population density of 170,000.  The rooms were expensive, they were $2 a week for a small basement and $6 a week for 2 rooms in a tenement.  It was a source of investment for higher classes. 
 
 
Problems: There were many problems with the tenements.  They were overcrowded with multiple families living in one room.  As well, the living conditions were very poor; there was no protection from the hot and cold.  Fire was their only source of heat.  Generally there was one common sink and outdoor bathrooms for the whole tenement, leading to a lack of sanitation.  There was a higher death rate among the tenements compared to other living arrangements.  In addition, the tenants were taken advantage of by the landlords who made 20% off of the tenants when they should have only made 6%; 6% would have been more beneficial to both the landlords and the tenants.  Lastly, it was a poor environment for children to grow up in.  There was a lack of privacy, and abundance of domestic violence and alcoholism. 
 
Solutions: Many solutions were proposed to solve the tenement’s problems. To fight the heat, the tenants would sleep on the roof of the tenement houses or buy ice if they could afford it. St. John’s Guild was a charity organization that helped to relieve the heat. The Fresh Air Fund contributed by sending children to the country for the summer. Some suggestions that were offered were to give free ice and to tear down the tenements and build parks in their place. To fight the general misery, organizations such as the City Mission and Children’s Aid Society helped the people living in the tenements. Some suggestions that were offered were to teach the people to care about their families and sanitary practices. Giving away free fruit and medical assistance were also suggested.  The rich were made more aware of the plight of the poor. Another problem that activists tried to fix was how unaccountable the landlords were, so a law was passed that required that the landlord’s name be displayed in the rooms of the tenements. A proposed solution to this problem was that if the landlord only took a six percent profit then quality rooms could be offered for only $1.50 a week. To fix the general disorder in the tenements, it was suggested that each one employ a housekeeper or janitor.
 Link to Tenement Museum of New York

"Life in the New York Tenement-Houses"
"Life in the New York Tenement-Houses" first appeared in Scribner's Monthly.  William T. Elsing was a clergyman from the Dewitt Memorial Church who devoted 9 years to help the poor in the East Side of New York City.  He gives a more truthful account of what he has seen and heard, rather than cramming in all of the thrilling and startling facts about tenement-houses that other articles tend to do.  He talks about how living in a tenement-house is not synonymous with living in the slums even though most people think it is.  An ordinary tenement house consisted of 5 stories of different types of homes, varying in amount of rooms and pricing, and a basement.  Four families typically occupied a dark and dirty floor that had sinks in the halls.  Tenement houses had a landlord, an agent, and a housekeeper.  Some families sometimes have to go half clothed and live on the cheapest food in order to provide rent, but not all of the people are thriftless; 700 out of every 1000 depositors in one of the banks on the Bowery live in tenement-houses.  Sometimes people start out poor, being at a low point in their life, but then are eventually able to get out of the tenement-houses.  Elsing tells two stories that depicted the different people who lived in tenement-houses.  One German woman with a daughter couldn't pay for rent, and ended up with her furniture on the street, and after Elsing talked with her neighbors and learning she had good character, he rented her two small rooms.  Two months later when she couldn't find a job, and Elsing having heard of a job in Orange, New Jersey, arranged for the woman to get the job and paid for her fare.  On the other hand, a Polish man tried to make money from the author by playing on the sympathies of poor people. 
Discussion Questions
1) How do Elsing's accounts of the tenement-houses compare and contrast with Crane's depictions in Maggie: A Girl of the Streets? 
2) Were the solutions realistic?  What do you think about them?  Do you have any other ideas for solutions to tenement-house problems?
3) Refer to the following two quotes:
"The girl, Maggie, blossomed in a mud puddle"- Crane
"Some of the noblest young men I have ever known have worthless, drunken parents.  Some of the most beautiful flowers grow in mud-ponds, and some of the truest and best young women in our city come from homes devoid of good influences; but in all such cases uplifting outside help has moulded their characters."- Elsing
How likely do you think it is for someone to get out of the tenement-houses and make something of themselves?  Is Elsing's quote too optimistic, especially relating to Maggie's situation? 
 
 

2 comments:

  1. My response is to question 2. Solutions were realistic but often couldn’t be carried out because there was little funding and the rich, upper class was uninterested in the issue at hand – poor families in crowded, insufficient tenements. Elsing even says this on page 133: “The outside world has always been more inclined to listen to weird, startling, and thrilling statements than to the more ordinary and commonplace facts.” Free fruit and medical assistance had to be paid by someone, and the tenement residents surely wouldn’t have been able to afford it otherwise. However, free fruit and medical assistance would have been extremely helpful in that it not only would have kept disease down in the tenements, but also given children a healthy diet, replacing unnecessary alcohol, to start their lives out on a good track. The Library of Congress website notes that residents’ only source of heat was a fire, and if that wasn’t possible, kerosene lamps were used instead. Many immigrants, especially Italians, were used to working and eating outside. Because these tenements were so claustrophobic, residents had to work, eat, and sleep inside with limited arrangements. These conditions led to increased spread of vermin and disease. Sickness also could have been procured through the lack of fresh air. This being said, more solutions could have been proposed to ease the stress of residents and help them live more comfortable lives. Even though parks were suggested to be built, and were unreasonable due to space consumption, I think small rest areas around the tenement blocks or markets could have helped. Perhaps a small pavilion-like structure with tables for citizens to work, eat, and relax under. Since rooms became hot in the summer and roofs were the only solution, pavilions would have helped offer a cool, shady place. Also, more lighting fixtures could have been installed in the tenements to increase productivity and comfort. If not in the rooms, then maybe in the pavilion structures. Elsing writes that the new tenements avoided sickness altogether by keeping sinks out of the hallways and hiring housekeepers, which made a pretty decent living. Another solution: older tenement buildings should have offered more jobs for residents, such as plumbers, construction workers, and housekeepers in return for free or reduced rent. At the bottom of page 134, Elsing describes how there was a mutual relationship between landlords/agents and housekeepers, suggesting older tenements could have made out better if they had hired a few residents to keep the buildings tidy. This would have solved many issues, such as unsanitary sinks and bathrooms, unappealing rooms to those considering renting, and residents with poor cleaning habits, since housekeepers often kept an eye on the tenants and made sure they cleaned up after themselves.
    http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/immigration/alt/italian6.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would just like to address this post overall in a comparative view of Maggie to tenement life. Tenement life seemed like a terrible state to be in, with the lack of hygiene and space. However, Maggie's home life is, from what I gathered, not quite the same as expressed here. The image I created throughout Maggie's time at home was one more of an apartment style housing area. I may be wrong, seeing as I only have words to work with, but Maggie's home life did not seem such a terrible condition
    When Maggie is out on her own, she doesn't really have anywhere to stay. In honesty, I believe tenement housing would have been preferable. It's hard to relate Maggie's case to Elsing's optimism because there were so many factors working against Maggie. She was a single, "sinful" woman without a home, rather than just a "Ragged Dick". There's a hopelessness that surrounds a girl with the odds stacked against her. In this case, it's hard to really make a relation between tenement life and Maggie.
    I do like to be optimistic and believe that it was possible to move from the tenements and have a better life, but there's so much that we don't know without personal experience or knowledge of certain factors. As we see with Maggie, her situation was pretty hopeless based on a variety of factors. However, I would think that compared to modern times, tenement life may have been as hard to deal with as the current families and people living in poverty. Even in this case there may be a culture difference that can't be accounted for.

    ReplyDelete