Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Crane, Mayakovsky, Wilson and the Brooklyn Bridge Poems


The Brooklyn Bridge is one of the most iconic engineering feats in New York City. Construction started in 1869 and it took fourteen years for the bridge to be finished, opening in 1893. The building of the bridge proved to be dangerous, claiming the lives two dozen people and cost $15 millions dollars in that time, which equates to about $320 million today. The bridge spans over New York City’s East River and connects Brooklyn and Manhattan. A German immigrant, John Roebling, who he died during the construction phase, originated the idea for the bridge. The bridge stretches a total length of 5,989 feet and the span between the large towers measure 1,595.5 feet, which at the time made the Brooklyn Bridge the world’s largest suspension bridge.



Bridge During Construction:


Hart Crane: ‘To Brooklyn Bridge’

Crane (1889-1932) was an American poet who came to New York from Cleveland, Ohio. His poetry became known for being ecstatic and his use of rhetorical verse. His poem, ‘To Brooklyn Bridge’ is a prelude to a longer poem entitled, ‘The Bridge.’ The poems were inspired by experiences he had while living in Brooklyn Heights in an apartment with a view of the bridge in the distance. Crane described his location adjacent to the bridge in a 1924 letter to his family, describing the bridge as ‘the most superb piece of construction in the modern world.’ His works regarding the Brooklyn Bridge was both inspired and provoked by the work of TS Elliot, in particular ‘The Wasteland.’ Crane’s work aimed to be more optimistic regarding modern and urban culture. Elliot’s ‘The Wasteland’ holds a negative view on modern culture and the reason he wrote the poem was because he believed modern people simply did not care about and were not passionate about anything. He intentionally made the poem hard to follow, with many different speakers and references to classic literature, almost challenging readers to read further if they do not understand a reference. 

TS Elliot’s ‘The Wasteland’: http://www.bartleby.com/201/1.html

In ‘To Brooklyn Bridge’ Crane is speaking to the bridge, admiring it from afar because of its immense size and beauty. He notes how the sun hits the bridge and admires the way the bridge seems to hang free in the air. A person runs to the top of one of the towers, pauses for a moment and then jumps to their death. Crane discusses an obscurity the bridge possesses. The bridge seems to represent the anonymity of people and, much like time, makes them feel small and anonymous. This explains why the identity of the person who jumps is not noted (gender, age etc.) and they are just a stranger seen from afar. As night falls on the bridge, Crane sees the lights on the bridge as endless, again drawing a parallel to the bridge and the passage of time, comparing the bridge to an eternity. Throughout the poem, Crane uses many religious symbols, calling the bridge ‘obscure as that Heaven of the Jews’ in reference to a mysterious heaven in Jewish scriptures. He also ends the poem asking the bridge ‘of the curveship lend a myth to God,’ meaning to descend a level and fill a gap God has left.


Vladimir Mayakovsky: Brooklyn Bridge

Mayakovsky (19893-1930) was a Russian poet and member of the Social Democratic Labour Party. As a child, he was dismissed from grammar school and spent time in prison due to political activities with the Labour Party. His early poetry showed him to be an originator of a writing style called Russian Futurism, which rejected traditional elements of poetry to favor experimentation. Mayakovsky’s works lacked a traditional metrical structure and he rather relied on forceful rhythms and street language that was viewed as not poetic at the time. He wrote the poem in 1925 while visiting the United States. He viewed himself as being ‘larger than life’ and in his writing is saluting the bridge as an equal, from one large force to another.

He begins the poem by marveling at the physical size and beauty of the bridge. He compares himself to a devout religious follower entering a great church, humbled by what he sees. He also feels like a conqueror and feels ‘drunk with power’ and ‘clambers with pride’ when he set foot on the bridge. He feels a sense of great pride when thinking of the bridge, which is sort of odd seeing that he is not a native of the US but is from Russia. He is so in awe that he goes as far as saying that if the world was to end, the bridge would not only survive and withstand the world ending but be the influence in future people recreating the modern world. He goes into a darker area of his writing, referencing the many people that come to the bridge to commit suicide. This is interesting because in the first few lines he writes ‘I too will spare no words about good things’ and intends to write only good things about the bridge. He sees future generations acknowledging the bridge where he was inspired to write his greatest work as he see the bridge as place of great inspiration.

Edmund Wilson: The Finale at the Follies and Thoughts of Leaving New York for New Orleans

Edmund Wilson, born in New Jersey on May 8, 1895, had a formal education, which was gained through attending prep school and Princeton. At Princeton he befriended F. Scott Fitzgerald. They were lifelong friends and Wilson even edited his final books, ''The Last Tycoon'' and ''The Crack-Up''. He would go on to review books for Vanity Fair. Edmund Wilson was the first person to review Hemmingway. He believed Hemmingway’s work to be a ''distinctively American development in prose.'' Hemingway declared that Wilson's opinion was the only one ''in the States I have any respect for''. He went from there to be the literary editor of the New Republic sharing his concern of culture with his readers. This is where our two texts come from. Once the depression hit, Edmund Wilson turned to political topics. This led to his travel of various countries and production of one of his most famous works, ''To the Finland Station''. It looked at the different views of how society should be ran in Europe. Wilson then joined the New Yorker and a few years later was confronted on writing his views on the ongoing war (WWII), which he was completely against the US joining, let alone the ways they acted. He focused on this for years to follow. When the Cold War started, again he was against the one up way of America. He even refused to pay federal taxes at the time to prove a point. He wrote a book on the topic and explained he was not paying for America wanting to impose democracy. He actually received a Presidential Medal of Freedom from Kennedy in 1968 (Johnson, however, performed the ceremony) and acquitted some of his tax evasion charges. He went on to teach at Wesley University. He died on June 12, 1972.

The Finale at the Follies is a description of a dress rehearsal of the finale for musical that is set in Mexico. From the scenery (mission and cactuses) and from the costumes (sombreros). The text is a typical newspaper description.

The Thoughts of Leaving New York for New Orleans(1926) is also an account of what Wilson sees, but set in poetry. Every stanza is a different scene from different types of New Yorkers and areas of New York on a typical winter night. Each stanza includes less than three sentences. He points of every walk of life actions/thoughts that others would not know in the beginning. Wilson injects a line of about the scenery vague every now and then. The second half is descriptions of specific places and their residence. The first part of this half is the actions of these people and the second is how everyone is contradicting themselves or others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Wilson#.22Edmund_Wilson_Regrets....22

Discussion Questions:
1. Do you think Crane succeeded in writing a poem more optimistic then Elliot's? Why, do you think, if he was trying to sound optimistic, would he include the anonymity of a stranger committing suicide?
2. What do the religious symbols add to the poem and what do they say about the Brooklyn Bridge itself?
3. What effect does the format of the text of Mayakovsky's poem have? Why do you think Mayakovsky wrote his poem in this style?
4. Why do you think Mayakovsky would express such pride in an American engineering feat when he himself was Russian?
5. Why, if promising only good words in the opening lines, does Mayakovsky (and Crane, for that matter) reference the suicides that occurred on the bridge?
6. Why do you believe Wilson wrote The Thoughts of Leaving New York for New Orleans as a poem, unlike his other review?
7. What problem(s) do you believe he was trying to highlight?
8. Do you think Wilson favored a set of people? (Remember he was a close friend of Fitzgerald)
9. What was Wilson's motive for the title?

7 comments:

  1. [Half-value informal response]

    I really appreciated the way Mayakovsky's poem was formatted. I enjoy reading poetry when I'm relaxed and slow down to take it in. At this point in the semester/year, it is easy to just breeze through readings in a stressed-out attempt to get all our homework finished. Mayakovsky's format gently calmed my racing brain and guided me to take time to savor the poem, which made me enjoy it more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Valdimiar Mayakovsky’s “Brooklyn Bridge” is very interesting in many aspects. The most noticeable aspect of this poem is the way in which the text lies. The broken fragments of sentences, spread across the page with varying degrees of spacing on each line makes the words feel as though they are suspended on the page. Perhaps Mayakovsky intended the words to mimic the manner in which the Brooklyn Bridge is suspended. The unique spacing of this poem takes an increased amount of time to read. Mayakovsky may have intended this to be reflective of the vast amount of time that was placed into building such a majestic piece of infrastructure. Similarly, the spacing between each line of the poem may represent the idea that bridges are constructed in pieces, and that these pieces fuse together to constitute the whole. Another interesting aspect of Mayakovsky’s poem is the fact that he is a Russian native, and yet he is marveling at an American masterpiece. I feel that his motivation behind doing so is to exalt this marvel as an accomplishment of mankind, regardless of nationality. It is also true that many immigrants were responsible for the manual labor that corresponded to the task of building this bridge. Thus Mayakovsky’s work could act as a display of respect to the immigrants who helped to produced something that was truly a novel and beautiful creation for its time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In response to question 4, I feel as though an accomplishment such as the Brooklyn Bridge is something to marvel at even if you were not American at the time. It is a feat of mankind, rather than of the US. The bridge is something new, and one as extraordinary as this can demonstrate the progress of mankind. Mayakovski also demonstrates this in the way he writes. His style is very unconventional and structurally different than how poems were usually written. He goes against old ways, just as the bridge is, considering a bridge this grand has never been built.
    This pride for the progress of mankind has even been seen in more recent decades, such as the space race or the development of treatments for diseases. People seem to be proud of mankind for these accomplishments, no matter what country produced it.
    In addition to the accomplishments of mankind, I also feel that politics may have an influence of his opinion. He is from a communist country and this bridge was a capitalist feat. He most likely hopes that the world will continue to move forward despite this. It is symbolic of the link from past to future.
    In response to question 5, the references of suicide take away from the majesty of the bridge. While it is something to admire, it may not be as spectacular as it appears.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In response to the third question, I really think the format of the poem made you slow down while you were reading it. Initially when I read the poem the broken up lines made me want to read faster, however to really understand the poem I had to slow down. I think Mayakovsky wrote his poem in this way in order to have the reader slow down and enjoy the poem like he enjoyed the Brooklyn Bridge. After finishing the poem it was obvious he thought highly of the Brooklyn Bridge. Especially since he basically says that if the world was destroyed and the only thing that remained was the bridge, that the people of the future would be able to recreate the world as it was when he wrote the poem. I believe this shows that he wants the reader to get a sense of how great the Brooklyn Bridge is and by slowing the reader down he is able to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Personally, I'm not great at interpreting poems. So, based on my own view, I didn't get a sense of optimism from Crane's poem. The theatricality and detailed descriptions he puts into his poem paints a very good picture, but that's mostly how I saw it. I would interpret the poem as Crane using his unique form of poetry to create this detailed image in your mind, which is exactly what a great poem should do. However, I didn't get a sense of optimism, although there can be different interpretations of what optimism is defined as in the case of a poem. Regarding the man jumping off the bridge, I don't really have an explanation for why he would include it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In response to question number four, I feel like Mayakovsky was simply looking at the feat as that of something accomplished by humans, not just a part of them. While I'm sure he felt plenty of Russian pride, and certainly felt much less of the Americans, the building of the Brooklyn Bridge was a major event. One would be hard-pressed to not be even a little bit impressed at what the humans that had conceived and built it had accomplished with the structure.

    Certainly today most people look at the Brooklyn Bridge and think that it's jut a bridge. After all, so many other, more impressive buildings and structures have been built after it. So why should the Brooklyn Bridge be thought of as special? It seems that people have forgotten what a feat it was to be built in the time that it was. Looking at the pictures, I can't even really begin to imagine how the people of the time period even thought something of this caliber was possible. Especially considering the fact that they had nowhere near the building apparatuses and tools that we have today. The building of that bridge was no menial task, and I feel like Mayakovsky knew and respected that, even if his own people were't responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In response to question 2 I think that Crane used the various religious symbols to show that the Brooklyn Bridge was such a impressive human accomplishment that it could have been made by the divine. This also relates to question 4 because both of the poets reference divinity within their poems, so Mayakovsky isn't so much considering the bridge as an American creation, but as a world wonder, and proof that humanity could do impressive things.

    On question 6, I think that Wilson wrote The Thoughts of Leaving New York for New Orleans as a poem to widen the appeal it would have. Not as many people read reviews compared to those who may read a poem. This way he was able to highlight the way that New York life was really draining the people who lived there, and reach more people than if he were to simply write a review that may be skipped by people looking for more entertaining readings.

    ReplyDelete