Harlem Poets and Writers
The Harlem Renaissance, otherwise known as the Great Migration, was a massive movement of African Americans from the Deep South to Harlem, New York. The movement began around 1890, shortly after the abolition of slavery in the United States. The installment of the Jim Crowe laws along with the uprising of numerous hate groups in the South encouraged many African American to relocate to the North. Many African Americans found themselves segregated into urban slums. The largest was Harlem. Many found that they shared similar experiences while being enslaved, and as a result, they embraced their heritage and a cultural eruption ensued. The result was the emergence of jazz music, ragtime music, writers, poets and actors, all of whom, for the first time, embraced their African American heritage.
Claude McKay was born in Jamaica 1889. By
1912, he had already published a book of verses called the Songs of Jamaica. He then traveled to the United States where he
attended both Tuskegee Institute and Kansas State University (“Claude McKay,”
1). McKay later wrote on issues concerning the political and social injustice
that the African American population faced (“Claude McKay,” 1). He also wrote
extensively about his homeland in Jamaica (“Claude McKay,1”). In the 1920s
McKay traveled abroad to Russia and France to study communism (“Cladue McKay,”
1). In 1934, he returned to the United States and moved to Harlem, New York
where he continued to write for the remainder of his life “Claude McKay,”1).
McKay’s writing in the early years of the Harlem Renaissance helped to set the
tone for many writers and poets of the great movement.
In the Tropics of New York, McKay is reminiscing
about the beauty of his homeland. He longs to be under the blue skies and fruit
trees of Jamaica once again. As he looks out the window, he realizes that New
York is no paradise. It does not contain the vibrant colors and beautiful
sounds of the tropics. The realization brings him to tears, for he does not
hunger for the sweet fruit of the trees, but his homeland itself.
In The Harlem Dancer, McKay begins by
describing the lavish Harlem night clubs. The prostitute dances as young men
watch and applaud. Though her job seems harsh, her voice is compared to a soft
flute. He also adds a picnic day to his description, which is completely
opposite of the night club. His other comparison is to a palm tree, “grown lovelier
for passing through the storm.” This suggests that she is very strong as has
most likely gained this strength due to the hardships of her job. The end of
the poem brings a reality to the night club. The prostitute is objectified and
is truly a victim.
James Weldon Johnson was born in
Jacksonville, Florida in 1871 (“James Weldon Johnson,” 1). At a fairly young age, he attended Atlanta University
and became a principal in Jacksonville for a few years (“James Weldon Johnson,”
1). He moved to New York in 1901 to work with his brother as a composer, where
he became a songwriter for Broadway (“James Weldon Johnson,” 1). Soon
thereafter, Johnson became a civil rights activist for the NAACP. He also acted
as a diplomatic consul to both Venezuela and Nicaragua.
In his novel The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man, Johnson follows the life on
an African American man who faces the issue of racial identity in the time of
the Harlem Resonance. The description that Johnson gives of New York City is
one which is beautiful on the surface, yet hidden beneath this beauty lies
corruption and injustice. In this small excerpt, the narrator gives a detailed
description of his first night in New York. He describes his experience at two
different apartment clubs, which he tours with a group of young men. The first
was a home that had been converted into a bar. It is here that the narrator has
his first experience with gambling. He describes how he initially had no
interests in the game, yet upon winning first game, he gained an intoxicating
thrill from his actions. He described how such feelings were what led men to
become addicted to the game. This inevitably led many men to lose all of their
possession. He hints that, over time, he was consumed by this game as well. The
second home the group visited had been converted into a night club. The
narrator was elated with the idea of the glitz and glimmer of this New York
lifestyle. The narrator spends a great deal of time discussing ragtime music,
which was playing in the club. This form of music was novel at the time of the Renaissance.
He describes the musicians as immensely talented, yet despite all of their
talent, this genre was often ignored by many, especially the Caucasians. In
Johnson’s words “The fact is, nothing great or enduring, especially in music,
has ever sprung full-fledged and unprecedented from the brain of any master” (Johnson,
394). In his final words, Johnson
describes Harlem as having the same unrest as the ragtime music.
Langston Hughes, a poet and
playwright and writer of the Harlem Renaissance, was first recognized during
this time. He was born in Joplin, Missouri, and eventually moved to Mexico with
his father. At just thirteen, he moved to Illinois, to live with his mother who
then settled in Cleveland, Ohio. He acquired many jobs, including an assistant
cook, launderer, and busboy while studying in Columbia University in New York
City. In 1924, he moved to Washington D.C. and wrote his first book of poetry
called The Weary Blues. In Lincoln,
Pennsylvania, he finished his college career and wrote his first novel, which
won the Harmon Gold Medal for literature.
Source: http://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/83
In one of his autobiographies, The Big Sea, Hughes provides a summary
of his experience in this era and the distinction between blacks and whites at
this time. He describes the shows, music, and African culture that were
signature to Harlem, which, at the time, was a place untouched by tourists and
the rest of society. Hughes then describes the impact the whites had on this
culture. The white patronage at Harlem clubs was typically received happily by
owners, but blacks did not feel they were welcome. According to Hughes, once
the white tourists began to discover the night clubs, entertainment shifted to
appeal to them, and African culture lost its authenticity. As he states, “The
old magic of the woman and the piano and the night and the rhythm being one is
gone,” (Hughes, 634). This was also true for writers, as they began to focus
their literature on amusing white people. In order to avoid tourists, he spent
weekends at house-rent parties, which were becoming very popular at the time.
According to Hughes they were more amusing than any night club in town.
In addition to a changing Harlem
society, Hughes describes how the Negro Renaissance was not as extravagant as
it seemed, and people often had the wrong idea about it. The negroes themselves
had not even heard of this renaissance.
Discussion Questions:
1.
How does McKay’s poem, The Tropics of New York, imply what New York City may have looked
like in reality? How does this contrast with the fantastic descriptions of New
York during the Roaring Twenties?
2.
Is the prostitute the only victim in the night
club? Who else may have been a victim?
3.
Johnson states, “The fact is, nothing great or
enduring, especially in music, has ever sprung full-fledged and unprecedented
from the brain of any master” (Johnson, 394). Do you think that Johnson is not
only describing ragtime music, but the equality of African Americans during this
time as well?
4.
Johnson describes New York City by stating, “She
sits like a great witch at the gate of the country, showing her alluring white
face and hiding her crooked hands and feet under the folds of her wide garments
(Johnson, 487). What corruption could he possibly be referring to? How does
this description relate to the mindset during the Harlem Renaissance?
5.
Hughes describes how “everything goes, one way
or another.” The 20’s are gone and Harlem lost its unique charm when it became
a commercial place for tourists. Does this still happen today? Where are some
examples?
6.
How do the feelings the American Americans had towards
the whites compare to today? Do you think that African Americans still believe that
their cultural explosion was suppressed by Caucasians?
Reading these pieces I thought that the Harlem Renaissance was perceived to have a negative connotation to many African Americans at the time. First of all, addressing Claude McKay's poem he focuses solely on how he misses the sights and sounds of Jamaica. When looking at New York he perceives things and in his mind relates them back to what he knows from back in Jamaica. I believe that if he was truly happy in New York, he would not miss Jamaica as much as he appears throughout the poem.
ReplyDeleteThe other point I want to make in regard to the Harlem Renaissance is about culture. When reading the second two pieces I thought that there was tension between change in culture, and people trying to keep it the same. An example of this comes with I mentioned in class, the use of the "n" word. This word became widely used in black culture, it even got to a point where there had an almost compliment type feel to it. However, white people quickly found out that it was not a word they were welcome to use. Many black people carried this conservation of a separate culture carried into other areas as well. Such an example of this can be seen in music. Popular music by some was saw as "selling out" and not really artistic. True music to the culture was artistic. I believe that some people felt a meshing of cultures was appropriate, others resisted change. This difference in opinion created an atmosphere that was not as wonderful as some might see by just looking at the surface.
1. The poem highlight that the city is not like the paradise that the author calls home. But I do not think that this contradicts the stereotypical image that 1920’s New York produces. The poem talks about quite fields and fruit trees and uses languages that implies a simple relaxed surrounding. 1920’s New York is not known for having a quite or relaxed atmosphere. When I think of New York I think bright lights and parties. I think speakeasies on every corner, Jazz music, and dancing. Over all New York is high energy, this poem is longing for a low energy atmosphere. I believe that this poem is longing for a calmer atmosphere and missing home but the author is not trying to convince the audience that the city is not what it seems. Instead the author is saying that he is tired of the energy and wants to go somewhere calm.
ReplyDelete2. I think that the quote is true about everything. No ideas is perfected by one person, so to make anything “full-fledged” it has to be worked on by more than one person. I think that this does apply to equality. The quotes mentions a “master”, which in music would be the man who comes up the original inspiration. For equality this would mean the government since it abolished slavery. This would create equality since it is no longer acceptable to own, and place yourself above, another person. However, this is only one type of equality, to truly achieve equality, it must be acknowledged by people on a personal level. So to achieve equality and make it “great and enduring” it will need to be accepted by everyone. This is the “one” part. Success is in music and equality is measured in popularity, and many people need to work on both for either to be achieved.
My comment will deal partly with #1 and partly branch in a new direction. As we talked about in class, McKay's poem really brings out his homesickness. It could be a rare insight into the possibility that New York wasn't all it was made out to be, except for the fact that McKay has made a major shift in his surroundings going from Jamaica to the city. His disappointment probably isn't a reflection on the city - it is simply the fact that he has left behind what he knows and is missing it terribly.
ReplyDeleteEither way, New York was less than McKay expected it to be. I think this ties in very well with the themes we have noticed in the other books we've been reading. In Age of Innocence, there was a heavy emphasis on keeping up appearances in society, even if the life beneath the facade was in turmoil. This comes up in The Great Gatsby, too. There are things going on behind the scenes such as Daisy and Gatsby's affair, but as long as appearances and expectations are met, life continues. Gatsby's parties in particular reflect this theme for me: the appearance is there of carefree extravagance and fulfillment, but really the event is just a spectacle where the impersonal masses try to forget their own troubles and shortcomings. So too, New York falls short of McKay's expectations. Despite the praise so many others gave to the city, building up its glorious appearance in the world's eyes, McKay feels unfulfilled and longs for his home. Like Gatsby's parties or the winking upperclass in Age of Innocence, McKay sees New York as just an empty outer shell missing its essential heart.
My reply will address question number four. I feel that Johnson quote reflects the corrupt nature of both the twenties and New York in general. New York had a long history of corruption at this time that dated back in to at least the mid 19th century. Vice, crime, and corruption can be seen in books such as Maggie as well as being well documented in history with political corruption and graft such as the Tweed ring based at Tammany Hall. In addition to this the 20's showed the advent of Prohibition. Because of Prohibition, corruption in the form of rum running and establishments such as speakeasies. Because alcohol was illegal many made fortunes off smuggling and selling it. (Such as the fictional Gatsby) Because of the money to be made off of liquor, organized crime flourished further adding to the corruption that was present. Due to all of this crime and corrupt both of the 20's and as a part of New York City history, it is no wonder that Johnson describes New York City as having hidden corruption. Corruption was probably a very real part of the Harlem Renaissance both due to the culture and history of New York City as well as the nature of the times.
ReplyDeleteMy response will tackle questions 1 and 2.
ReplyDeleteWith McKay’s poem, it is easy to see that New York wasn’t the glitz and glam that all the books and novels show it to be. The Tropics of New York shows that New York is trying to give comfort to the people that are not natives. We see that various fruits are being sold on the street, yet these tropical fruits do not bring comfort to the author, whom we assume to be McKay. It seems like New York was not truly the place to be at, if even outsides can’t find comfort in the simple street vendors selling their wares. It was advancing at such a high rate that many citizens, including McKay, could not adjust to it. They longed for the way life was before, a simpler time. McKay even writes at the end of his poem “I turned aside and bowed my head and wept.” I think this speaks wonders to the affect New York was having on the citizens, especially those who were not natives. It might have been a spectacular place to be at if you had all the money in the world, but for the regular people, it was not all it was cracked up to be.
As for question two, I feel like the entire immigrant population was being the victim in the second poem by McKay. They had to do jobs they did not entire enjoy or want to make end’s meat. At the end of the poem, you can see that this dancer is not comfortable working as an exotic dancer in the club. The gentlemen who come to see her are not concerned about whether or not the dancer is happy with her life. They only truly care about “getting aroused” in the club. The poor immigrants of New York were simply looking for jobs that would sustain their way of living, even if it meant being an exotic dancer in a night club. McKay does an excellent job of describing the darker side of New York during the roaring twenties, when one would imagine everyone was going to parties and having a blast. It really puts into perspective what New York as a whole looked like, aside from the novels and movies being made about the time.
This is in response to question number four about the corruption in New York City. There is political corruption, which is prominent in New York city during the early 1900s. Another type of corruption in New York City is the corruption of the mind. The last type of corruption that can be seen in New York City during this time is police corruption.
ReplyDeletePolitical corruption cannot really be seen in Johnson's piece, but this was the era of prohibition and Al Capone. During this era gangsters basically ran the towns. The main group that ran New York City during this time was the Tammany group. They would use bribes, favors, and hire people to conduct violence against groups. The Tammany group also led New York's police system to become corrupted (Drehle).
The police were normally hired or bribed to carry out the dirty work of the Tammany group. One of the big events going on at this time was the strikes against garment factories and the horrible working conditions. The police would be hired to occasionally beat up or arrest the men and women that were protesting. The Tammany group would also hire other people to beat up the strikers. Most of the time, when the strikers would get beat up, a cop would be standing right there. The victim would go to the police and plead for them to help. Instead of helping, the police would arrest the victim for things such as insulting a police officer (Drehle). Corruption of the mind can be seen in Johnson's piece The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man.
Within Johnson's piece, there is a lot of corruption of the mind. For example, when the narrator is gambling, he keeps betting and wanting more and more. This is corruption of the mind because he basically becomes addicted to gambling and cannot stop. This obsession alters his mind and corrupts it to make it seem like gambling is ok, when it might not be ok according to his morals or in the culture he was raised. This type of corruption can also be seen in other Harlem Renaissance writings. Another Harlem writer, Claude McKay, he writes about the corruption that happens with a prostitutes. The watchers of the prostitute get corrupted in the sense it becomes an obsession (most of the time). The prostitute gets corrupted as well because she becomes objectified, which can lead the prostitute to lose self-esteem or she becomes out of touch with reality because that is the only way she can handle the stress. Overall, there are three types of corruption that Johnson could have been talking about: the corruption of the mind, political corruption, and police corruption.
Work Cited
Drehle, David Von. Triangle: The Fire that Changed America. New York: Grove Press, 2003. Print.
In response to the first question, I think McKay’s poem really implied that not everyone sees New York as a great amazing city and that there is more than one opinion of the city. In the poem there is this idea that he is longing to go back to Jamaica. To him, New York City did not compare to his homeland and the bright and vibrant environment he was used to. Also the way he described his homeland when he talked about the “blue skies” and “nun-like hills” shows how much more laid back it was than New York City (459). I believe his poem does not necessarily highlight the truth about what New York City really looked like, but instead it highlights the fact that not everyone saw it the same way. McKay’s poem really contradicts the usual portrayal of New York City in the previous reading we have read. For example, in Walt Whitman’s poem “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry” we see how much he truly loved the city and we get a sense of how amazing he thought it was. Whitman was able to see beauty in simple things such as the light reflecting off the water surrounding the ferry. To him, his Jamaica was New York City because that was where he spent most of his life and he considered New York City his home. As well, I believe that descriptions of the Roaring Twenties were just another person’s view of what New York City looked like. Overall, the reality of New York City was based on the each person’s own view of the city.
ReplyDeleteThis can be expanded to the idea of the African American’s cultural movement being suppressed by the whites at the time. There were different views of the Harlem Renaissance, and in Hughes article we get to see his perspective as an African American. He states that, “Thousands of whites came to Harlem night after night, thinking the African Americans loved to have them there,” which provided this idea that the white people thought that the Harlem Renaissance was this great thing (633). However, then Hughes presents his reality of the time as an African American. He talked about how the downtowners only came to be entertained by the African Americans and that they amused them. There was also this idea that musicians and writers started to change their style to please the white people, in essence losing their cultural identity. This once again really shows how there can be many different views of the reality of New York City throughout different time periods of its history.
In response to question #1, I think McKay's poem shows that New York during the Harlem Renaissance had traces and aspects of appearance that showed the people's longing for their home lands. The narrator talks about the fruit he sees, when in his homeland would be in the trees and growing, now sit in a window for purchase. When he sees this the narrator cannot help but to think of the trees and growing fruit of his homeland and how drastically everything is in New York. He weeps at the end because he knows that in New York there is no chance to have anything resembling the fruit trees of his home and trying to recreate things from home is more painful than helpful because it reminds them of something they cannot have anymore. I think the poem implies that New York City tried to show traces of culture from other places where new inhabitants came from, but the effort is more harmful than helpful and brings the narrator to tears thinking about what he left behind and probably what he cannot get back.
ReplyDeleteIn response to question 2 I do not think that the prostitute is the only victim in the night club. When I read this poem I got the sense that innocence was an important theme. In the very first line it talks about the “young youths” and “young prostitutes” that were present in the audience. Youth are often times viewed as innocent. I believe that their age is significant because it shows that their actions are a learned behavior. They do not understand how watching the dancer is objectifying women and African Americans. It is just something that they were raised thinking is normal. This means that most of the audience can be classified as victims of society. Their innocence has caused them to be naïve in regards to their actions and the consequences that may result from watching the dancer. I believe that way adult's actions shape young mind is something that we need to be aware of even today. It is easy to see how the generation that people were raised can influence their perceptions of the world. For example I believe that our generation is becoming much more accepting of homosexuality opposed to older generations. We see it everywhere especially with how prominent it has become on television shows and I think that this is a good thing. Children do not need to come into the world with a preconceived notion of what is right and wrong. They should be allowed to form their own opinions. It is likely that the youths present at the night club never had this opportunity. We can see that they are shaping their lives to be just like other adults during their time. The opinion of society can be highly influential and sometimes it does more harm than good.
ReplyDeleteI'll be responding to question 1. From my experience, the depiction of New York during the Roaring 20s was that of insane crazes and wildly outstanding clothes. Within that, I understand that bright colors and patterns were supposedly the scene, so the fact that McKay seems to be suggesting the opposite is surprising to me. McKay is comparing his original home, that of Jamaica, to his current home of New York. He points out just how peaceful and colorful that his Jamaica is in his mind, and he appears to be disappointed, as can be inferred by his weeping, in the place in which he currently lives. That being said, he might just not enjoy the 'hustle and bustle' of New York. Perhaps the depictions of New York in the Roaring 20s are extremely accurate, and McKay is merely longing for the peacefulness of his former home? I feel like such a thing would be able to relate to anyone that moved from even the countryside to New York. I would even consider myself to feel that way whenever I visit cities, as I recently realized in my trip to Los Angeles. It is a beautiful enough place in its own right, but it is not a place I would like to get used to living in. I feel like this is more of what McKay was trying to portray; the fact that he was used to, and preferred to, live in a place of peace.
ReplyDeleteI am answering questions 1 and 4.
ReplyDeleteIt’s obvious that Claude McKay misses Jamaica. His poem The Tropics in New York finds McKay reminiscing about “the old, familiar ways”. It is possible that all of this was triggered by seeing fruit and produce in a store window. These familiar things from his homeland transport him there for a few moments, and after he is done travelling through his memories and returns to the streets of New York, his quick trip leaves him depressed and disappointed. I think that this implies that the flashy glamour of the Roaring Twenties is vain and empty. New York could never have the same type of beauty that Jamaica did. The writing also gives the impression that Jamaica was associated with purity in McKay’s eyes. The fruit that he describes are fit for parish fairs. The fruit trees under the sky at dawn seem so peaceful and at rest on “nun-like hills”. New York was definitely not pure or at rest, especially during the Roaring Twenties, and I think McKay was tired of the emptiness.
I also believe that this ties into question #4. New York City was a symbol of hope and prosperity, freedom from persecution, a place to make a better life. Partying was added to that list in the Roaring Twenties. Many immigrants flocked to her shores, only to be thrown into a life of hard labor. The peril started shortly after passengers left their ships. In Triangle - The Fire That Changed America by David Von Drehle, a young immigrant woman could be preyed upon by “a ‘white-slaver’ in the crowd, a seemingly friendly lady or gentleman who would offer to show her the way to her uncle’s apartment – except that when they arrived where they were going, there would not be any uncle, just an ordeal of forced prostitution.”(Von Drehle Chp 4). Even before they could make it to the people expecting them, immigrants looking for a prosperous new beginning were snatched away by the “crooked hands” from under the “wide garments”. It was all a façade. In Harlem when more and more white tourists came to see and be entertained, the owners of some establishments starting to cater to what they thought would please their white customers more than their colored customers. “The lindy-hoppers at the Savoy even began to practice acrobatic routines, and to do absurd things for the entertainment of the whites, that probably never would have entered their heads to attempt merely for their own effortless amusement.” (Hughes) It turned from true entertainment for their local community to phony stage acts just to please outsiders for the sake of money. The owners of these tourist attractions sold out, becoming less and less original, pushing real members of Harlem to adjust and change over to “the Saturday night rent parties” (Hughes) instead.